According to Science, This Is What Will Happen 10,000 Years From Now

What Will Happen 10,000 Years From Now
Imagining the future of humankind, our planet, and everything dear to us in our corner of this dark and cold universe is usually the field of science fiction, and we usually worry about a few hundred years at best, but what about thousands and thousands of years? What will happen then? Thanks to the various scientific tools, it has become clear that some things in the distant future can be predicted with surprising accuracy.

What Will Happen 10,000 Years From Now:

Based on what we know about life, the universe, and everything, some scientific forecasts in areas such as astrophysics and evolution can reach hundreds of thousands of years in the future, and several timelines can be found fixed on Wikipedia, among which one is based a lot on science fiction and popular imagination, but let’s see What the science says will happen in the nearest distant future, about 10,000 years from now.

To begin with, it will then be that the eastern Antarctic, the largest continuous ice sheet, has completely disappeared, and models predict that if the Wilkes sub-basin collapses, then this huge ice mass will take 5,000 to 10,000 years to dissipate in The sea, raising its water level from three meters to four, and it is likely that there will be no human presence at all during this period to deal with the rise of sea water, according to an estimate made by the Australian theoretical physicist (Brandon Carter), which he called (Burhan Judgment Day) There is a 95% chance that the human race has died Me completely during 10,000 years, and this topic has received a lot of controversies, so we are not sure whether humans will survive for that time or not, but if they can survive there will be no regional genetic differences between them, and this does not mean that all people will be the same, but none The genetic differences between them (such as blue eyes versus brown ones) will spread evenly around the planet.

It is also expected that during the next 10,000 years the giant red star (Antares) will explode, transforming into a supernova super bright that will be visible during the day (in fact, the star Antares is expected to explode at any moment, so we hope that this will happen). Soon so we can see it in our sky instead of imagining it will happen at a time when our offspring are extinct.)

If we extend that time window to 13,000 years, the tilt of the Earth’s axis would be reversed, separating the seasons between the two hemispheres, which would be confusing to us if we lived.

But regardless of whether humans will survive until that time, Pioneer 10, 11, Voyager 1, and 2, and New Horizons space probes will continue to sail across the stars, not for thousands, but millions of years.

If we looked farther into the future, 296,000 years from now the Voyager 2 would surpass the brightest star in our sky (Sirius).

All of these expectations deal with the closest possible point of what we know in the distant future, yet we are already feeling dizzy.


What Would Happen If We Consumed All Sources of Fossil Fuels

Fossil Fuels
The mere thought of this question is awe in our minds, although we have been aware of the seriousness of global warming for a relatively long time, governments have not pursued protective policies until recently, even companies that supply us with energy are still looking for other sources of fuel.
Will our dear planet withstand this catastrophe?

How does global warming happen?

When burning fossil fuels, carbon dioxide and other gases are released into the atmosphere.
These gases accumulate in the atmosphere, and they are called greenhouse gas, because they absorb the sun’s rays from the surface, preventing them from leaving the atmosphere. The climate translates those rays into heat, and thus our summer becomes hotter than before.

If we continue to burn fossil fuels, greenhouse gases will accumulate in the atmosphere more and more, which means absorbing more of these rays and allowing our planet to absorb more heat.

Land and ocean currently absorb much of the fossil fuel burning waste.

But in one new study, the effect of burning 5,000 gigatons, the estimated stock of fossils on nature, has been investigated, and researchers have found very frightening results.

Researchers expect the Earth to be able to absorb carbon until about the year 2100, but at this point, the Earth will be saturated with carbon dioxide, and you will not be able to absorb more.

The oceans will have less capacity to absorb emissions, which will push most of these emissions into the atmosphere.

Also, extremely high temperatures will limit the growth of plants in the tropics.

By the year 2300, scientists expect that the rise in temperature will be between 6.4 to 9.5 degrees, and between 15 and 20 degrees in the Arctic.

In addition, there will be a noticeable change in the rate of precipitation, as it will increase in frequency in certain areas.

Other studies suggest that global warming resulting from the burning of the entire fossil stockpile will cause entire ice to melt in Antarctica, thereby increasing sea level by about 200 feet, i.e. dumping most major cities in the world.

As governments talk about keeping global warming less than 2 degrees Celsius, energy companies continue to search for places and other sources to extract hydrocarbons.

At this point, it is never clear which future lies ahead. But in any case, do not panic now, the effect of global warming will not start with one night.

Fortunately for us, energy production with renewable sources such as wind, water, and the sunlight is developing well.


What Would Happen If a Solar Storm Hit Us

This is what would happen if our planet was hit by a solar storm and ended the age of technology as we know it today:

First, let us rejoice because the greatest solar storm that struck Earth in recorded history was at a time when our human civilization was not greatly susceptible to the anger of solar radiation.

In the Carrington incident, known as the (Solar Storm of 1859), a burning mass was seen emanating from the sun towards the Earth’s magnetic sheath, creating a massive magnetic storm that had not been witnessed before in modern civilization.

He collided with the geomagnetic atmosphere a barrage of charged particles that lit up the sky of the world in a phenomenon known as the (Aurora), but with strong electric currents that swept the world, the telegraph systems covering Europe and North America were cut off and sparked sparks from the telegraph devices, causing damage Some people were caught in the fire, and even some devices that were disconnected from electricity were still working and sending strangely intermittent messages!

In other words, it was chaotic technological chaos, and from a futuristic view nearly a century and a half away from the accident, you believe that what happened at that time can be easily contained now.

What would happen if a solar storm hit the Earth today?

No one knows for sure how things will go wrong, but given the frightening extent we have reached in our dependence on technological infrastructure and compared to our technological development at the time, it will certainly not be easy.

Perhaps the most important evidence lies in some strange incidents that occurred in the spring of 1989 when many solar storms hit the planet, which led to the emergence of twilight in the sky again, which led some to believe that what they see is only the foggy effects of the Third World War.

However, it was not a nuclear strike until wired signals and space communication systems were disrupted, as the Earth’s magnetosphere absorbed most of the charged particles.

The greatest results were those that occurred in the city of Quebec, Canada, the electricity was cut off by six million people, and the interruption lasted for a few hours for most people, and the rest waited for days until the electricity returned to them naturally.

This type of solar storm is what terrifies scientists in the White House, a majestic solar storm that brings humans back to the Middle Ages.

Solar storms of this huge type strike the Earth nearly every 500 years, and when they strike, they are enough for communications and energy systems to go out of business around the world for days, months or even years, and don’t forget GPS systems, satellites, broadcast services, the Internet, the phone, systems Transportation, drains … etc, and we will not be able to know when the Earth will strike until hours before it happens.

This talk sounds like a film about disaster, but this fact remains and is not science fiction, as conservative estimates indicate that the amount of damage caused will reach $ 2 trillion for the first year only, and with concerted global efforts we will need nearly a decade to recover from the effects of this ordeal.

On the other side, more extreme, others estimate the size of the losses at $ 20 trillion, which will cause us to reassess the risk of destruction caused by space disasters.

Astrophysicist Abraham Loeb of Harvard University to Today Today explained that: “In the past, most attention has focused on space hazards on asteroids that might hit Earth. In the past decade, we haven’t had the same technological infrastructure that we have today, and technology today Growing rapidly, so the damage will be asymmetric between past and present. ”

In the best-case scenario, the strike will only result in distortions in communications systems, but history shows that potential interference in the wrong type of technology system may have devastating consequences, such as moving the world to the brink of a nuclear war.

According to Francis O’Sullivan (Director of Energy Research at the MIT Institute) told CNN: “An event similar to what happened in Carrington may be catastrophic if it happens tomorrow, the lamps are not the only ones that will be extinguished, bank accounts will disappear, if you can imagine what would happen if the stock market stopped For a week or a month, or did the connections stop for a week or a month? You will know that this will be the greatest disaster facing the entire world. ”


What Would Happen If the Earth Rotated Faster?

Earth spin faster

What would happen if the Earth rotated faster? Sitting in your house on the sofa, have you ever thought that you are not really in a static position? Yes, that’s right. The Earth always moves relative motion compared to the universe around it. It revolves around the sun just as it revolves around its axis.
Many natural phenomena occur around us, such as changing weather and wind, tides, and many other natural phenomena that occur due to these two relative movements of our planet (especially its rotation around itself). This is what prompted us to say, Have you ever wondered what would happen if the earth began to spin faster? Let’s take a look at the answer!

What is the reason for the rotation of the Earth?

To answer this question, we must go back in time to the time when our solar system began to form. Initially, our solar system was made up of huge clouds of dust and gas.
As soon as the cloud began to collapse on itself, it turned into a giant disk with a bulge in the middle, what formed the sun at the end, and the planets and other celestial bodies (such as comets, asteroids, and moons) began to take parts of the original disk, then a need arose to maintain the overall angular momentum of the system. Thus, these celestial bodies inherited their rotation from the total motion of the solar system.
With no imbalanced forces in the system (nothing we currently know!), The inertia of the sun and planets maintained their combined rotation for billions of years. Moreover, it will continue to do so for billions of years until it collides with another crime.

The importance of Earth’s rotation

The 24-hour Earth’s rotation rate makes the Earth a suitable place for life, as it maintains the surrounding Earth’s temperature. The surface is flooded with sunlight during the day only for an appropriate period and then cools in the dark during the night.
The Earth’s atmosphere is exposed to an internal pulling force toward Earth due to its rotation (along with the planet’s gravitational force) and also maintains an appropriate distance from its surface.
The tidal phenomenon – the continuous rise and fall of sea level – occurs as a result of both the Earth’s rotation around its axis and the effects of gravity from the Earth and the Moon.

What would happen if the Earth rotated faster?

  • Weightlessness:
What would happen if the Earth circulated faster, the wind speed increased throughout the day, rough floods, the reason for the rotation of the Earth, the Coriolis force, zero gravity
If you now weigh about 150 pounds at the Arctic Circle, your weight may drop to 149 pounds at the Equator. This is because of the additional centrifugal force generated, the equator rotates faster to travel a greater distance, compared to the poles. The faster you achieve, the more weight you lose.
If the velocity at the equator increases above 17,641 mph (28,320 km per hour), the centrifugal force will overpower the force of gravity, that is, we will be weightless!
  • Rough floods:
The extra velocity at the equator will cause the ocean water to accumulate there. At a rate, just one mile an hour faster than normal, the water at the equator will become deeper with a few inches in a few days. The centrifugal force will propel thousands of gallons of water toward the equator.
Many lowlands in the world, including New York City, Venice, Mumbai, and many other areas, will be inundated if the speed exceeds a few miles per hour, and millions of people are displaced from their homes.
  • Wind speed increases:
Earth’s rotation is not considered the dominant force controlling the Earth’s atmosphere. Heat transfer (convection) and winds occur due to the uneven heating of the planet’s surface. On the other hand, the Coriolis effect plays its role in the directional deviation of these winds.
As the Earth’s rotational speed increases, the pressure of the heat transfer cycles will increase, and the weather may carry more storms and hurricanes.
It is clear that the increased speed of the Earth’s rotation has different effects on life ranging from the increase of earthquakes and tsunamis to the shortening of the day, and people may float in Central Africa while the polar ice may melt very quickly, flooding most parts of the world with water.
On the other hand, the Earth’s rotation is slowing down due to the presence of the moon. Each year, the Moon acquires a little energy from the Earth and pushes away far too small. The Earth’s rotational speed has been estimated to decrease by 1.4 milliseconds over the past 100 years. If we consider this a reference point, it would take about 50,000 years to add one second to the length of the day on Earth.
For the Earth’s rotational speed to increase significantly, it must be struck with a sufficiently large object! This will have many consequences, such as the dissolution of the Earth’s crust and large earthquakes that can easily kill us all.

What If Building Grows?

What If Building Grows?
Architecture is a whole life. When we want to study the history of any civilization or learn about its way of life, we first look at its urban development, because it gives us a strong and frank impression of the way of life used in that civilization.

For example, if we look at architecture in Egypt, we will immediately know that there is a large population density in that country, and if we look at the buildings of Syria or Gaza, for example, we will surely know that there is a grinding war that transformed those architectural buildings into crumbs of architecture, already telling us the story; the full story of the place It’s an interesting thing that made me ask myself dozens of questions every day. The strangest thing was: What if architecture grows? What if we can control the behavior of substances? What if we tried to create a new technology like hydroponics technology that injects crops with specific, studied materials that determine their behavior? What if we could reach the atoms of those substances and make them viable ?! what if architecture is growing?

In fact, the idea seems to be a scene from a science fiction movie; strange and almost impossible; I mean, when scientists put forward the hypothesis that the Earth is round; many people attacked them and today here we are, in this world everything seems applicable.

So I was trying to make my questions somewhat logical so I started looking for the behavior of materials, and about the extent to which they can control their properties, and it seemed to me that science is giving a great interest in this topic; but what I imagined was much greater and far beyond everything.

I was wondering about a technique that enables us to completely change the behavior of the materials used in construction, I don’t know, a magnetic field, injecting them with chemicals, the important thing is that we make those materials one way or another gain the property of infinite expansion and expansion, that we control the behavior of atoms and electrons, and make them reproduce and divide continuously So, that building block starts building automatically and forming a huge part of the building, it’s really a fun way of thinking.

The beautiful thing in knowing that it was born from an idea that was once a fantasy, and the imagination is something that is not limited and is not governed by any laws.

Imagination is a great idea; but some people prefer to think logically, but I have great hope for what I am saying here because scientists have already recently succeeded in changing the behavior of carbon by means of nanotechnology, a technique that is based on converting molecules that make up matter into very small nanometers, This technique was used on carbon material by emptying the electric arc and laser ablation, high pressure carbon monoxide, and chemical precipitation of vapor, or in a simpler way to vaporize this material and then reassemble the vapor atoms.

This technology gave the carbon material completely new properties, which made it the most solid, and rigid material among the materials discovered in terms of tensile strength and elastic modulus, respectively. Read More about New techniques stretch carbon nanotubes, make stronger composites


What If the Earth Is Flat?

What If the Earth Is Flat?
What If the Earth Is Flat?

What if the Earth is flat. Humans knew the reality of spherical Earth for thousands of years, and they confirmed this fact when the Soviet Union launched the Sputnik 1 satellite in 1957 that orbited the Earth.
However, a small group of people recently appeared on the Internet insisting on denying this fact and calling the flatland community, seeming to have planted suspicion about the simplest aspect of this reality, and the owners of this theory made a great effort to devise alternative explanations of why the world behaves like a sphere while It is, they claim, flat, although observations made by humans about the planet over thousands of years show that the Earth is round.
However, if the Earth were somehow really flat, it will not move like the movement of the planet we know today and humanity will disappear and anything else. “For an astronomical object to form a disc – rather than a spheroid – it must be rotated at very high speeds,” says David Stevenson, a planetary scientist at the California Institute of Technology (Caltech of Pasadena).
Astronomer James Clerk Maxwell  explained mathematically that the solid, disk-like object is not a stable form in the universe in his work on Saturn’s rings, as his research predicted that it was formed from many small particles that are not interconnected and turned out to be right, and explained the mathematics that Maxwell also worked on it because there are no planet-sized disks floating around the galaxy.
We need magic to make the Earth flat without rotating it at great speeds, and it will not withstand long, as gravitational forces will affect the planet within hours on all sides equally. – Centrifugal forces – against the forces of gravity, causing a flatness at the equator.
Thus Maxwell mathematically demonstrated that stable disc land is not possible under conditions of gravity, and without gravity everything would seem irrational. The atmosphere will disappear because it is connected to the Earth by gravity, and the tidal movement will also disappear because its movement is caused by the gravitational Moon that affects the movement of the oceans.
As for the moon, it will disappear, because any explanation of its existence includes gravity. In the most acceptable scenario, the moon formed when a giant object collided with the Earth at the beginning of its formation and the Earth picked up some of the wreckage of this body. Another scenario says that the moon formed at the same time that the earth was formed – again, thanks to gravity. – Or, the Earth’s massive gravity attracted large pieces of space as it orbited in space.
Gravity is responsible for the structure of the Earth’s layers. The most dense layers are in the Earth’s core, the least dense in the mantle, and the least in the crust.
The planet will move differently without this layer structure. For example, the outer core of the nucleus acts as a giant, large dynamic magnet, which creates the planet’s magnetic field. This field protects the atmosphere from the solar wind. For science, Mars lost its atmosphere after its magnetic field disappeared four billion years ago.
Flat Earth theory owners have arguments for explaining previous observations on a flat planet. The problem, according to David, is that these interpretations have no mathematical or physical basis. When Maxwell predicted that Saturn’s rings were made of small particles in the 1850’s, this was demonstrated by general knowledge of how gravitational and rotational forces worked, and his article on this topic was mostly Mathematical equations, and the flat Earth community does not work this way.
The Flat Earth community‘s view of the world includes selections from various interpretations of various phenomena.
In fact, Earth and the Moon are spherical for the same reason – that is, gravity – and the flat Earth community has to invent two different interpretations of both, and these two interpretations often conflict with each other, and scientific theories do not work that way.
Let’s put all this aside, if the Earth were really flat, this means that millions of scientists who deny the idea of a flat Earth and who have done this throughout history are involved in a cosmic plot for reasons that cannot be understood.


What If the Earth Was 50% Larger Than Its Current Size?

What If the Earth Was 50% Larger Than Its Current Size?
Many associate the idea of ​​the giant leap of mankind with the small step that “Neil Armstrong” made on the moon, while NASA astronauts and their chemical engineers disagree with it, as well as an astronaut “Donald Petit,” and the latter says that the revolution actually took place much closer to Earth.

He wrote in the year 2012: “The first step on the moon’s surface was not the giant leap in human history, but rather the reach of Earth’s orbit.”

Achieving the first step in reaching an orbit 400 kilometers from Earth requires half the total energy needed to reach Mars.

The distance between the Earth and the Moon is simple compared to the distance that we need to travel to reach the Earth’s orbit.

The cost of the first step is mortgaged by the amount of gravitational force.

Physicists believe that saving one penny of the total cost depends on Earth’s attempts to forcefully return your spacecraft to its orbit.

The Earth’s gravity tightens its grip on everything that comes to the surface of the Earth, which means it needs to get rid of 80-90% of the current missile’s mass by burning materials that generate energy to lift the missile into space. According to Petit, this means that its stability will be low and shaky and that this will leave no room for the transport of the astronauts, their food and their equipment.

Despite these faults, we are lucky.

“If the Earth’s radius was greater than it is now at a certain rate, we would not be able to manufacture any missile that could launch into space,” Petit says.

Petit began calculating, using the Tsiolkovsky missile equation, to determine this ratio.

Suppose a missile design with a 96% propulsion material and a 4% missile mass is the practical limit for vehicle launch engineering.

With a choice of hydrogen and oxygen mixture, the most active and effective driving chemical that can be used in missile engines.

By applying these numbers to the Tsiolkovsky missile equation, we can convert the product of the escape velocity into a planetary radius.

According to this equation, the radius of the planet will be about 9,680 km (the radius of the Earth is 6670).

If the diameter of our planet is greater than its current size by 50% – while maintaining the same density – we will not be able to invade space, at least not by using missiles.

Petit’s intellectual experience confirms several points. The first is that in this case, no current space transportation technology will succeed and will not be as efficient as the missiles currently in use, and we must devise modern technologies that can overcome the forces of gravity.

Several suggestions were made for such science fiction-inspired techniques, some of which were tested, while others were successful.

The second point is to consider establishing a launch base on the moon as an intuitive idea, as the rate of escape velocity on the moon is about 21.3% of the rate of escape velocity on Earth.

While launching a missile from Earth requires a lot of fuss and preparations, the launch from the moon still lacks many equipments.

Although the creation of a base on the moon similar to the base of “Cape Canaveral” is a distant matter, it is achievable with the development of 3D printing techniques as well as the processing of raw materials.

To achieve this goal, we need to extract most of the material from the moon or nearby space bodies such as asteroids and comets.

That is, we can use the moon to act as a gas station that treats its stock of icy water to convert it into bursting energy of oxygen and hydrogen.

That is, the earth – as Petit puts it – holds its grip on humanity. Our conquests into space managed to bypass this grip, and the possibility exists that they will finally be freed.


What if all cars disappear?

what if,what would happen,cars,what would happen if,what if computers disappeared,what if the sun disappeared,what if the sun suddenly disappeared?,what if the sun disappeared right now?,what if we killed all the mosquitoes?,what would happen if the sun suddenly disappeared?,what if computers were never invented,science,cars disappearing,mp cars disappearing,cars disappearing gta 5

What if all cars disappear?
How many cars are there in the world right now? It is estimated that in 2018, more than one billion passenger cars today roam the streets and roads of the world. The mark of one billion units was reached in 2010 for the first time in its history.

If the mass extinction of motorized vehicles were an instantaneous event, every driver and passenger of a car would be able to accelerate faster than on a road at speeds ranging from five to 90 miles per hour. You hear me: in the air. Finally, the acceleration of the car would be less than the force of gravity, and the unlucky passenger would crash on the cement, brutally injuring his body and, in all probability, would not come out alive.

If the cars of the world disappeared (suppose that no one was driving now, which has not happened for more than 50 years, practically since the end of the Second World War, but for questions, suppose), the effects of an imprudent world would become exponentially worse than you think. If you think that your morning commute is the worst part of your schedule, you are very wrong. As we deepen this fascinating thought.

To give you a fair idea of ​​our first issue, Stephen King wrote a short story in the 1970s entitled Trucks, which was later turned into a film called Maximum Overdrive in 1986. In this story, every car and every vehicle becomes aware and terrorizing. their owner is in a local restaurant/gas station. It is very well written and inspires reflection, I recommend it to fans of thrillers. But a story in a story stands out with a frightening surprise. While the main character wonders about his future, he says to himself: “Much of the world is paved now, even our playgrounds are paved … little by little, they can reach the world of their choice.

Our world is paved, it’s as simple as that. Paths, our number one method from point A to point B, are taken for granted every day. Almost every house is accessible by road. Finding an inaccessible home is unheard of and impractical. Garages are built in homes like shelves for a car. Driving is integrated into the infrastructure of our lives, it is the center of civilization. Cities are built around the highway. If all the cars disappeared, roads worth billions of dollars would be useless and we would have bulky sidewalks on which people could walk: an empty skeleton of what was once a magnificent transport route.

Wherever we go, we walk, drive or fly – unless you count the bike, the trains and the boats, which can belong to one of the three categories above, with the distance to the mind. In our daily life, walking is reserved for ridiculously short distances. We go to work, to school, to social activities. If you travel outside your city, it is incredible not to drive. Without cars in our lives, people would have a hard time going anywhere. Airports would be overwhelmed by ticket orders, pilots would be lost, exchanges and communication would be at a low ebb, as people have to travel to respond to these interactions.

In addition to our driving dependence, we need to drive to live, literally. In the United States, 35% of families grow gardens (, A. Cort Sinnes, April 2014), which means that 65% of families are the main source of food in grocery stores and restaurants. For almost all grocery stores, supplies are shipped by car. Some of you may argue that for delivery of food abroad, airplanes deliver food, but delivery trucks take food from the plane to the stores. We have so much confidence in our vehicles that we let them manage our lives. For example, it is illegal to drive a car without auto insurance, but you can live without life insurance. The human race can not function without a car. They are in every aspect of our lives, an invention more powerful than the light bulb and as essential as the computer.

We need cars, and without them, we would not be here very long, so drive carefully.


What If All Houses Were Covered With Solar Panels?

What If All Houses Were Covered With Solar Panels?

What If All Houses Were Covered With Solar Panels?

You can do anything under the sun … when the sun is feeding everything.

Your phone, your house and everything in between. It’s life on the gold grid. But is this the utopia we thought we were?

In 2018, the state of California passed a law requiring that all new homes be built with solar panels after 2020. You may think that this sounds both extreme and unfair, knowing that house prices will rise $ 12,000. But it’s a lot more logical than you think.

On the one hand, families will earn money from their new homes by saving about $ 19,000 over 30 years. Meanwhile, California will produce 74% of its electricity from the sun.

Unfortunately, not all parts of the world are like sunny California. So, if we tried to follow their example, would we be willing to fail?

In fact, California’s solar initiative is hardly impressive on the world stage. In Australia, for example, about 15% of homes are already equipped with solar panels.

And in Belgium, this represents around 7% of households. But in the United States, only 0.5% of households are equipped with solar panels.

Of course, that could be a lot more. Like so much more.

A roof of just over 8 billion square meters in the United States produces 1,400 terawatt-hours of electricity with solar panels each year. That’s 40% of current energy production in the United States.

Of course, we must first settle a few points. It’s one thing to get all homes to have solar panels, but it’s not so easy to make sure everyone has a reliable power supply in time.

For example, some countries do not get as much sun as others, or they simply have fewer people or less energy, which prevents them from relying solely on solar energy. Think of it this way. We said earlier that if every Californian home were equipped with solar panels, the state could generate about three-quarters of its energy from solar energy.

But as a result of the same initiative, a state like Wyoming, for example, could only get about 14% of its energy from solar energy. So, the success of this type of program really depends on the management of the expectations of the population according to the energy needs of a given region, the amount of sunlight received by this region and the density of the population. within its borders.

Places that can not use solar power in their own right would be encouraged to use other renewable energies adapted to their climate. The increase in global demand for solar panels would create millions of new jobs and new businesses.

To build all these new solar panels, we will have to increase our extraction of silicon and silver, which would be excellent news for China, because it is the world’s largest silicon producer! … and his second money producer.

We would need engineers to find effective ways to prevent surges. Also called “solar spills”, they occur when too much energy is generated during off-peak hours, such as during the day, when sunlight is strongest and demand is lowest.

This overwhelms the grid and can trigger power outages or frequency issues. The challenge for our engineers is to find ways to divert and store the excess energy produced, then recall it if necessary.

Solar cells are a possible solution, even if it is a very expensive solution. But hopefully, strong demand would reduce the costs associated with using solar energy.

In any case, after installation, users would be profitable on their solar technology in 5 to 10 years, then save a lot on future utility bills … while preserving the future itself.


What if another supercontinent forms?

What if another supercontinent forms?
What if another supercontinent forms?

In geology, Supercontinent is a continent formed by the fusion of two or more continents due to collision. Gondwana is an example of a supercontinent, broken into modern continents; India, Africa, South America, Antarctica, and Australia.The Earth’s crust is not solid; it consists of seven small and ten major tectonic plates, which move and slide over molten rocks, collide with each other or diverge. They move at the same speed as your nails, and have taken different forms throughout the history of the earth. At multiple points, all terrestrial masses converged together to form super continents, and the effects excavated on the rocks suggest that this could happen again.
There is no consensus among scientists on the shape of the next great continent; it depends on what happens to the tectonic plates beneath the oceans. When the peripheral plates hit other plates, subduction areas may appear (where a plate slides or falls under another and merges into its mantle). This occurs in the Atlantic and Pacific Oceans and in the Arctic Circle, causing tectonic plates to shrink and move. Research by geophysicists at Yale University suggests that the Arctic Circle may be the location of the next great continent.
When the rocks melt, the iron atoms are organized toward the Earth’s magnetic field. And then, when the rocks harden, they lock into place. This leaves a trace of the direction the land mass was facing when it was formed, so that as the continents moved we could see where it came from. By studying these effects, the team of scientists found that the center of each supercontinent was about 90 degrees from the center of the last one. If the next great continent follows this pattern, it will surround what is now the Arctic Circle.
Sources : Wikipedia 
Yale University